Comments on: Whole Foods Poisoning Social Media and Natural Diaogue

By: Samson G.

Samson G. — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:36:20 +0000

Are you planning to blog more on seo and internet marketing – I would like to learn more.

By: Jack Robert

Jack Robert — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:34:48 +0000

That was a great blog. Most seo blogs are not even worth reading.

By: gta

gta — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:16:31 +0000

I dont agree with you in 100%, but you covered some good points regarding this topic…

By: Fred

Fred — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:12:54 +0000

“Slimy little erotic tendrils” aside, I agree that it’s a bummer to hear about this petty and dishonest tactic from a company that as you note, “strives to be a outstanding model of integrity and quality” — this coming from someone who lives in the community where Whole Foods created quite a stir through this hullaboo about whether it was ethical to cage lobsters in tanks or not.

While it’s hardly surprising to hear the news, it is disappointing. Luckily there are quality local groceries in my market with enough natural food options to make Whole Foods irrelevant. Thanks for picking this up!

By: umm

umm — Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:24:29 +0000

What exactly is so terrible about this? Modern advertising in general exerts a far wider and more insidious influence, and it is accepted…

It’s the *internet* on *comment boards.* Any mode of discourse with a standard of annonymity is subject to gaming through manipulation of assumptions. duh.

of course the corporate world, even those trying ‘reform the system from within,’ will slip its slimy little erotic tendrils through every orifice of human authenticity, cloning honesty to harvest disposable plastic truth, sowing chaos amongst the chatter of the flock, bending the minds of the unscrutinizing this way and that to various banners and every variety of elan. duh.

your problem, my friend, is with the underlying necessity that propels deceit unto the world, not with articles of deception, abstract or concrete.

imho.

(duh.)